[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ESD-translators] typo in step 5b?
From: |
Ineiev |
Subject: |
Re: [ESD-translators] typo in step 5b? |
Date: |
Sun, 22 Oct 2017 12:37:33 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 01:47:41PM -0400, Ineiev wrote:
>
> Currently, step 5b says,
>
> > When using GnuPG, make a habit of glancing at that bar. The program
> > will warn you there if you get an email encrypted with a key that
> > can't be trusted.
>
> This is not correct. GnuPG warns when email is _signed_ with
> an unvalidated key. with respect to encrypted emails, GnuPG only cares
> to find a private key to decrypt the message. perhaps this should be
> clarified.
I attach a patch against current enc head.
invalid-key.patch
Description: Text Data
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- Re: [ESD-translators] typo in step 5b?,
Ineiev <=
- Re: [ESD-translators] typo in step 5b?, Thérèse Godefroy, 2017/10/23
- Re: [ESD-translators] typo in step 5b?, Ineiev, 2017/10/24
- Re: [ESD-translators] typo in step 5b?, victorhck, 2017/10/24
- Re: [ESD-translators] typo in step 5b?, Thérèse Godefroy, 2017/10/25
- Re: [ESD-translators] typo in step 5b?, victorhck, 2017/10/26
- Re: [ESD-translators] typo in step 5b?, Thérèse Godefroy, 2017/10/26
- Re: [ESD-translators] typo in step 5b?, Thérèse Godefroy, 2017/10/26
- Re: [ESD-translators] typo in step 5b?, victorhck, 2017/10/30
- Re: [ESD-translators] typo in step 5b?, Thérèse Godefroy, 2017/10/31